I'm going to knock this one out real quick. I've been receiving Jody Hice's propaganda-laden newsletters ever since I took to writing him regularly to tell him how disappointed I've been in various decisions he's made. He and I don't see eye to eye on any issues. His newsletters make me ill to read and his formulaic intern-authored replies anger me. So boom. No Jody for me.
I did, however, take time to surf around on Johnson-Green's website because I will not blindly vote for anyone this year. (I have in the past.) I was pleased to see that she is supporting common-sense gun laws - please go read her stance - she says nothing about taking 'yer guns away. I also love that she's a proponent for affordable college for every student regardless of background. Another issue that she and I totally agree upon is working on electoral form including un-gerrymandering districts that have been drawn up to serve one party over another.
Go check out both candidates - make your choice.
Two candidates: Jody Hice vs. Tabitha Johnson-Green
I did, however, take time to surf around on Johnson-Green's website because I will not blindly vote for anyone this year. (I have in the past.) I was pleased to see that she is supporting common-sense gun laws - please go read her stance - she says nothing about taking 'yer guns away. I also love that she's a proponent for affordable college for every student regardless of background. Another issue that she and I totally agree upon is working on electoral form including un-gerrymandering districts that have been drawn up to serve one party over another.
Go check out both candidates - make your choice.
Two candidates: Jody Hice vs. Tabitha Johnson-Green
-----
Might as well knock out another couple candidates in the same blog. Who's excited about our choices for senator of the 45th district?
Two candidates: Renee Unterman and Jana Rodgers
Interestingly, both of these candidates work or have worked in the medical field. Unterman lost me with her vague "sanctity of life" stance...I'm not really sure what she's talking about. It may be unfair to assume she's pro-life, but without further information I am wary. There really isn't much in the way of information regarding her "stances" on her website.
Jumping over to Rodgers' site I was interested to read her page on why she's running. She commended Unterman for her year's of service and then ever-so-politely threw her under the bus for a couple pieces of legislation that Unterman opposed (access to cannabis for certain medical conditions and pursuing justice for rape victims). I particularly love Rodgers' stance on getting money out of politics. She has paid for her campaign out of her own pocket.
Do you research - vote for the candidate who speaks for you!
No comments:
Post a Comment